"pages of gibberish about some supposedly new function that has deep meanings"
1
Notes from m___ 'some' relating to this one comment above :-
2 In the Desire or Need to Express an Opinion it is not always possible to match the Time needed to inform oneself so as to come to a well weighted, with factual scientific insightful, conclusion, on the part of some.
3 Making a sweeping statement which is expected, towards the Theoretical musings/ speculations, WITHOUT EXCLUDING the simple easy to prove for oneself Geometry / Maths,
suggest a lack of time at the least, since one would not want
to ascribe anything
else
as to the reason for making such a remark, considering that the motive of the source individual is not clearly known. However, Thanks is due for steering some, appreciative, traffic to that previous website, from even this negative comment as I discerned from e-mail.
4 Hence this new Twin wave website's attempt to make the info so easy to grasp for the benefit of even the briefest of perusal though this may be difficult if not impossible to achieve for all minds given the shortness of the attention span in this information glutted age.
{ toooo looong ?!!! } To which glut I gladly add of course !
5
In addition some 'history':-
6 The reason for re-doing this site mostly relate to the restrictive nature of the previous host. This new host allow more options. I trust that those who found the previous site fascinating, will get it, that simplifying things will not mean losing the "deep meanings" of the stuff previously given.
7
An observation :-
8 I am delighted to see that some are using the Twin wave EB- Calculations Graphics on their various sites even on tmblr.
9 That Fine;- it's yours to use as you please, - though my preference do lean towards Mathematics instruction as I also saw on a Math's teacher's Website ( Displaying EB-Geometry 'Pythagoras Applied' Calculations ) since the, simple easy to check, Geometry can benefit us with more Calculus insights one day when some Mathematics genius show us how to really apply it even beyond my speculations.
10 Perhaps some at the Universities / Colleges & Electronic companies, who has been recorded on my visitors log, are already using the EB-formula to explore possibilities like additional data carrying capacity within the now somewhat glutted Cell phone channel frequency spectrum,
which could be just one application even if the Twin waves idea itself MAY prove to be non-existent, ( .....in spite of things like "quantum entanglement" to which it suggest deeper insights etc..... )
the EB maths can still be applied to such venture's in
an emulation mode. If only they could reveal some of their direction of thought, yet I realize they have to play it close to the chest.... Patent's and Claims...I know
Not of course due to any worry that I may claim since I already renounced such. The Eb stuff is really free : )
11
And then this unsavory stuff :-
12 My only concern is that at least in two instances, serious attempts was made to link
this Mathematical Geometry Twin wave stuff to 'fringe science' unverifiable mystic ideas,
an act which
I GREATLY DISCOURAGE
but of course I am not able to stop such mention of Twin waves on those
mystic sites as these ones seek some sort of "prove" for their ideas.
13 The TOTALLY THEORETICAL / SPECULATIVE idea that more data may be carried / 'hidden' in the electromagnetic frequencies as suggested by the EB-Twin wave variable wave structures....as opposed to the assumed 'up to now ' sine wave form... unfortunately
( as anticipated )
do draw the attention of the mystics.
To Restate :
Twin waves even though being
A Mathematical / Geometric Reality, is
NOT "yet" PROVEN AS EXISTING OUTSIDE OF THE MATHEMATICAL / GEOMETRY FRAMEWORK. And I anticipate then that even IF one day Proven to exist, Twine waves will never , ever prove to be a Bases for concluding about stuff that belong to the Complexity of HUMAN FREE WILL
since such free will I Believe, CANNOT be made subject to 'Simplistic' patterns of a Mechanical Kind. Even Twin waves conceptually in it's GEOMETRICAL Complexity of Wave forms must prove to be Very, VERY much INFERIOR to the COMPLEXITY OF THE HUMAN MIND.
14
The 'gibberish' comment above was drawn from someone that saw such a link from a 'mystic' to my site.
15 The sober reality it seems is that the company
that
KEEPS YOU,
even uninvited,
due to the nature of the internet, influence the forming of opinion on the part of some.
16
Optimistically though :
I do note that most readers of my site are of such nature that they
seem to have more stamina for the scientific,
that include theoretical physics
( which indeed is "gibberish" to most "sane" people)
and of course easily verifiable
geometry/mathematics and are able to see past that sort of
'mystic attachment attempts'.
Thanks for noting that just because some "flies" are gathering around does not mean that the object of attention is rotten, it might actually be some desirable piece of fresh cake ! 'Swat' the "flies" away and see for yourself !
17
A request :-
18
Please enlighten me if you are inclined to such kindness, as to your thoughts about the "Newness" of this Circle connected with a Square Geometry
other than the Puaecellier-Lipkin linkage which was already commented on by a Professor of Mathematics Specializing in Geometry who at that time initially thought that the EB Linkage was the same thing.
19
It is actually using the same Number of Links
but with only the Pivot being in a different place
causing the EB to be a True Curve generator ( as opposed to an ARCH generator ) on it's Extensions while the Pauecillier-Lipkin Linkage is meant for generating straight lines.
20
Other learned one's such as a Doctor in Statistics,
a Maths Student and his Mathematics Lecturer at a well known University, also indicated upon being explained / shown this EB stuff in person, that they never had come across something like this in their studies.
21 So therefore my "tentative" claim to "Newness"
added to my own scrounging around
from about 1986 till now (year 2012) to search out something like this EB- Twin wave Mathematics.
22 All I could "come" up with is a 'suspicion' ( No real proof that is ) that this simple Circle + Square Relationship principles might have been discovered a few thousand years ago in what is called the Middle East today
( a historical source of Mathematical insights we all know ).
23
This statement above is based not on actually uncovering any direct Math's
but only a Historical symbol originating from that region which I "recognized" as being exactly CORRESPONDING to the essential 'Geometry / actually Trigonometry' of the Eb - Calculations coordinate Maths. You will spot this Symbol when you check out the Trace Circle Geometry.
In addition, there is the possibility that someone in Europe at the later part of the 16 hundred's could have made use of the 1/24th out of phase principle that is 'Hard-wired' in this Circle Square relationship but unfortunately the Maths of that work remain 'lost' to us till today it seems. This last possibility of Prior discovery, remain then even more Un-provable than the Middle Eastern connection.
Nevertheless I remain open to the idea that this stuff might have been discovered before, considering the fact that after thousands of years of Geometry efforts that took place, how would it be possible for this Simple but Fascinating
24
1/24th Out of Phase relationship
between the
Elementary Circle
and the
Common Square,
to
go
Unnoticed ?
Hardly likely , I 'feel'!
25
However since "suspicious feelings based on very flimsy similarities" is not proof, I do present it as "New" at least for our Generation Today.
26
You are of course asked to indicate whether you indeed did see such "EB like" stuff,
elsewhere, before and correct my perspective on things.
That would be
much appreciated and
any acknowledgement will be given
upon such proof provided. ( A previous claim that this Twin wave stuff was thought of about 70+ years ago was unfortunately not backed up with any record of
Mathematics nor did that 70+ year old Idea itself directly match, that is Geometrically correspond to EB - Geometry ....So please be thorough ! )
